Send your website address. Get the facts in writing.

Nothing. One written report, no invoice, and no call required. We can afford to do this because the assessment is also how we avoid taking on work we can't do extraordinarily well. It protects both of us.

No. The report stands on its own: the state of your site, what a rebuild would involve, and a fixed quote if you want one. If the honest answer is that you don't need us, the report says so, and you keep it either way.

No. Most aging sites are the product of reasonable decisions made on older platforms, plus time. The report describes the condition of the site, not the character of whoever built it.

Just your website address. If you can also share your hosting bill and any monthly maintenance invoices, even better; the running-cost math is usually the most clarifying part of the report.

Only if you want to. The report arrives in writing either way. Plenty of owners prefer to read it, forward it to whoever manages the website or the money, and then talk. Some prefer to start with a conversation. Both doors are open; neither is required.

Whatever you decide. Proceed, and the fixed quote in the report is the price. Sit on it, and it doesn't expire. Hand it to another developer, and it'll still be accurate. It's an inspection, not a leash.

Less than you'd fear, and that's by design. A finished rebuild has nothing that needs us: no plugins to patch, no maintenance schedule, no monthly dependency. The site keeps running untouched. And because everything is built on open, widely used technology and handed over fully documented, with every account in your name, any competent developer can pick it up. Your last developer's disappearance hurt because the site needed them. This one won't need anyone.

Most rebuilds for 10 to 30 page business websites land between $2,500 and $7,500. Your report includes the exact fixed quote for your site, based on what it actually contains, and the quote doesn't expire while you think.

For some businesses that's genuinely the right answer, and if it's yours, the report will say so. The differences that usually decide it: builders start over rather than migrating your content and Google ranking, they charge forever, the design is theirs not yours, and the moment you need something the template can't do, you're back to hiring someone. If your site is simple and your ranking doesn't matter, use one with our blessing.

Mapped in the assessment, before anything is quoted. Most integrations either come along or get a modern equivalent that works better; anything that can't be preserved is flagged in the report so you know before you commit, not after. Same for your content: every page, post, and image is migrated, and you approve the result page by page.

Weeks, not months, for a typical business site. Your report includes the timeline for your site specifically, and because the old site stays live throughout, the schedule never holds your business hostage.